Creese, Andrew J. and Cooper, Helen J. (2007) Liquid Chromatography Electron Capture Dissociation Tandem Mass Spectrometry (LC-ECD-MS/MS) versus Liquid Chromatography Collision-induced Dissociation Tandem Mass Spectrometry (LC-CID-MS/MS) for the Identification of Proteins. Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry, 18 (5). pp. 891-897. ISSN 1044-0305
![]()
| URL of Published Version: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pubmed&pubmedid=17350280 Identification Number/DOI: 10.1016/j.jasms.2007.01.008 Electron capture dissociation (ECD) offers many advantages over the more traditional fragmentation techniques for the analysis of peptides and proteins, although the question remains: How suitable is ECD for incorporation within proteomic strategies for the identification of proteins? Here, we compare LC-ECD-MS/MS and LC-CID-MS/MS as techniques for the identification of proteins.Experiments were performed on a hybrid linear ion trap–Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometer. Replicate analyses of a six-protein (bovine serum albumin, apo-transferrin,lysozyme, cytochrome c, alcohol dehydrogenase, and β-galactosidase) tryptic digest were performed and the results analyzed on the basis of overall protein sequence coverage and sequence tag lengths within individual peptides. The results show that although protein coverage was lower for LC-ECDMS/MS than for LC-CID-MS/MS, LC-ECD-MS/MS resulted in longer peptide sequence tags,providing greater confidence in protein assignment. |
| Type of Work: | Article |
|---|---|
| Date: | 09 March 2007 (Publication) |
| School/Faculty: | Schools (1998 to 2008) > School of Biosciences |
| Department: | Structural Biology |
| Subjects: | Q Science (General) |
| Institution: | University of Birmingham |
| Copyright Holders: | Elsevier |
| ID Code: | 156 |
| Refereed: | YES |
| Local Holdings: |
|
Repository Staff Only: item control page


