ePrints Repository

The harmonization of business law in Africa: is article 42 of the OHADA Treaty a problem?

Enonchong, Nelson (2007) The harmonization of business law in Africa: is article 42 of the OHADA Treaty a problem? Journal of African Law, 51 (1). pp. 95-116.

Loading
PDF (182Kb)

URL of Published Version: http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayFulltext?type=1&fid=1029452&jid=&volumeId=&issueId=&aid=1029448

Identification Number/DOI: 10.1017/S0021855306000222

The primary function of the Organization for the Harmonization of Business Law in Africa (OHADA) is to modernize and harmonize the business laws of member states. The wider objective of OHADA is to attract foreign investment into the OHADA zone and to achieve economic integration in Africa as whole, as other African countries join OHADA. However, article 42 of the treaty establishing OHADA stipulates that French is the working language of the organization. This paper argues that this provision does not facilitate the goal of economic integration in Africa and that in one member state, Cameroon, article 42 presents serious constitutional and human rights difficulties. The paper suggests that article 42 should be amended in order to make it easier for key OHADA objectives to be attained and in order to remove the serious problems created in Cameroon.

Type of Work:Article
Date:April 2007 (Publication)
School/Faculty:Schools (1998 to 2008) > School of Law
Department:Law
Subjects:K Law (General)
Institution:University of Birmingham
Copyright Holders:School of Oriental and African Studies
ID Code:441
Refereed:YES
Export Reference As : ASCII + BibTeX + Dublin Core + EndNote + HTML + METS + MODS + OpenURL Object + Reference Manager + Refer + RefWorks
Share this item :
QR Code for this page

Repository Staff Only: item control page