ePrints Repository

A defence of Hart's semantics as nonambitious conceptual analysis

Rodriguez-Blanco, Veronica (2003) A defence of Hart's semantics as nonambitious conceptual analysis. Legal Theory, 9 (2). pp. 99-124.

Loading
PDF (146Kb)

URL of Published Version: http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayFulltext?type=1&fid=176186&jid=&volumeId=&issueId=&aid=176185

Identification Number/DOI: 10.1017/S1352325203000053

Two methodological claims in Hart's The Concept of Law have produced perplexity: that it is a book on “analytic jurisprudence” 1 and that it may also be regarded as an essay in “descriptive sociology.” 2 Are these two ideas reconcilable? We know that mere analysis of our legal concepts cannot tell us much about their properties, that is, about the empirical aspect of law. We have learned this from philosophical criticisms of conceptual analysis; yet Hart informs us that analytic jurisprudence can be reconciled with descriptive sociology. The answer to this puzzle lies in the notion of nonambitious conceptual analysis. The theorist analyzes concepts but accepts the limitations of conceptual analysis and therefore uses empirical knowledge and substantive arguments to explain, refine, or perhaps refute initial insights provided by intuitions. This is the conclusion that this paper arrives at as an argumentative strategy to defend Hart's legal theory from the criticisms of Stavropoulos and Dworkin. The latter argues that Hart's legal theory cannot explain theoretical disagreements in law because he relies on a shared criterial semantics. Stavropoulos aims to show that Hart's semantics is committed to ambitious conceptual analysis and relies on the usage of our words as a standard of correctness. Both attacks aim to show that the semantic sting stings Hart's legal theory. This essay refines both challenges and concludes that not even in the light of the most charitable interpretation of these criticisms is Hart's legal theory stung by the semantic sting. This study defends the view that Hart's methodological claims were modest and that he was aware of the limits of conceptual analysis as a philosophical method. He was, this study claims, far ahead of his time.
1 H.L.A Hart, THE CONCEPT OF LAW (1994).

2 Id.

Type of Work:Article
Date:June 2003 (Publication)
School/Faculty:Schools (1998 to 2008) > School of Law
Department:Law
Subjects:K Law (General)
Institution:University of Birmingham
Copyright Holders:Cambridge University Press
ID Code:442
Refereed:YES
Export Reference As : ASCII + BibTeX + Dublin Core + EndNote + HTML + METS + MODS + OpenURL Object + Reference Manager + Refer + RefWorks
Share this item :
QR Code for this page

Repository Staff Only: item control page